Photography in Public Space

By Cinzia D’Ambrosi

Editor’s note: This article was first published in What the Records Show, Cinzia D’Ambrosi’s independent publication dedicated to investigative reporting, documentary photography, interviews and cultural analysis. It is republished here for the Photojournalism Hub community.

Festival La Gacilly Baden Photo transforms the city into an open-air gallery. Through a conversation with festival co-founder Lois Lammerhuber, Cinzia D’Ambrosi reflects on the power of photography to shape public space, provoke dialogue and deepen our understanding of the world.

Martin Parr’s photographs on display at Festival La Gacilly Baden Photo, Baden, Austria. Photo: © Cinzia D’Ambrosi

There is something quietly radical about encountering serious photography outdoors. Not in a gallery, not behind a ticket desk, but embedded in the life of a city in its gardens, along its streets, in spaces where people are simply getting on with their day. That is the founding proposition of Festival La Gacilly-Baden Photo in Baden, Austria, and walking through it for the first time, I understood why it matters. You do not have to seek the work out. You do not have to know who Don McCullin is, or what Martin Parr has spent his life looking at. You can be passing through, your eye caught by something large and arresting on a wall, and suddenly you are inside a conversation you did not know you were joining. Whether you are conscious of it or not, you are living it. And that, in a time when photography is everywhere and yet somehow increasingly invisible, feels like something very meaningful.

This year’s edition, So British!, takes its title from its celebration of British photography, but the festival’s ambition reaches well beyond national identity. Rather than presenting a fixed definition of what British photography is, the programme reveals a shared sensibility that has shaped generations of photographers. It is a tradition rooted in close observation rather than spectacle, attentive to the lives of ordinary people and often characterised by irony, humour and an acute awareness of class and social difference. British documentary photography has long balanced empathy with restraint, allowing images to ask difficult questions without prescribing easy answers.

That sensibility runs through the work on display. Martin Parr’s satirical observations expose the absurdities of consumer culture with wit and precision. Mike Taylor’s photographs of football supporters capture not only collective passion but also rituals of belonging and identity. Mary Turner has spent decades documenting communities too often overlooked, while Sir Don McCullin’s uncompromising images remain among the defining works of humanitarian photojournalism. Their practices differ profoundly, yet together they demonstrate a tradition less concerned with isolated moments than with a sustained engagement with society and the people who inhabit it

I asked Lammerhuber when and how a theme gets decided. “The themes for each edition are collectively decided,” he told me. “Our team of three people may champion different topics, and while everyone has their own opinions, there is general agreement on the importance of each subject. Rarely much argument, as all subjects ultimately are important.
Sitting with Lois, it became clear that the theme functions as a framework rather than a constraint. Each photographer retains a distinct voice within it. The programme moves in a deliberate, linear way through what Lois describes as the human condition: beginning with people, suffering and endurance, before expanding outward into environment, science and technology. It is a journey that asks something of the viewer at every stage.

Visitors pause before Terry O’Neill’s “Swinging London” exhibition at Festival La Gacilly Baden Photo, Baden, Austria, featuring his images of the Beatles and David Bowie. © Cinzia D’Ambrosi

As I thought back to my walk through the festival the previous day, I realised how carefully the exhibitions had been sequenced. One seemed to lead naturally into the next, creating a sense of progression rather than interruption.
That sense of connection extended beyond the exhibition route itself. During the opening week, Lammerhuber brings together 152 photographers, curators and journalists in the same hotel, many of whom have never met before. Conversations continue over breakfast, during walks through the exhibitions and long into the evening. Photography becomes not only something displayed but something shared. As one of this year’s guests, I found those exchanges almost as memorable as the exhibitions themselves.
As our conversation continued, I asked Lois how he would know the festival had achieved its purpose. He answered that it was important to him that visitors leave with an open question, something unresolved, provoked by the work they had seen. Not conclusions, but thought.

The festival embraces an impressive breadth of practice, from classic photojournalism and documentary photography to street photography, portraiture and long-term visual storytelling. Yet despite the diversity of approaches, the exhibitions remain connected by a shared concern with the urgent issues shaping contemporary society.

Helmut Habersack and Lois Lammerhuber present Water is Life, bringing scientific knowledge and documentary photography together to highlight the future of the planet’s freshwater. © Cinzia D’Ambrosi

In the Science and Technology section, the festival’s invitation to reflect becomes something closer to humility. Curated by river scientist Helmut Habersack and photographer-publisher Lois Lammerhuber, Water is Life brings together scientific knowledge and documentary photography to confront one of the defining challenges of our time: the future of the planet’s freshwater. Among the works, a NASA photograph of Earth seen from space arrests the viewer. The image is iconic, yet encountered here outdoors, woven into the rhythm of everyday life, it acquires a renewed power. Our planet appears as a small, fragile sphere suspended in the vastness of space, reminding us of both its beauty and its vulnerability.

From this perspective, statistics become profoundly human. More than eight billion people depend on a finite supply of freshwater, while climate change, pollution and unsustainable consumption place increasing pressure on rivers, lakes and aquifers across the world. The exhibition succeeds because it transforms these abstract realities into something deeply felt. Rather than overwhelming visitors with data, it invites them to pause, to reconsider their place within the natural world, and to recognise that water is not merely a resource but the foundation of all life. By combining scientific insight with the emotional power of photography, Habersack’s contribution demonstrates how visual storytelling can bridge the gap between knowledge and understanding. It reminds us that protecting water is not simply an environmental imperative, it is a profoundly human one.

Supratim Bhattacharjee’s work brings attention to the impact of extreme weather and rising sea in parts of India. © Cinzia D’Ambrosi

Among the photographers Lammerhuber spoke about with particular feeling was Supratim Bhattacharjee a photographer based in India whose work documents the devastating impact of climate change on his country and its people. What makes his practice distinct is not only the quality of the documentation, but the position from which it is made. He is not an outside witness.
He is living the reality he photographs. As rising seas and extreme weather reshape parts of India, the burden falls hardest on those with the least. His photographs are not made from outside the story but from within it.

A photographer who is both witness and subject does not resolve those questions. But they shift something fundamental.
The image carries a different kind of authority, not the authority of distance, but of proximity. Of skin in the game.

Sir Don McCullin, the legendary British photojournalist, was a guest of honour at the Festival. © Cinzia D’Ambrosi

Those same questions about witnessing, responsibility and representation echoed throughout the festival. They returned with particular force when Sir Don McCullin spoke about his own work. Much of documentary photography’s history has been built on the figure of the outsider, the photographer travelling to witness suffering that is not their own. That tradition has produced extraordinary work, but it has also raised difficult questions about representation, power and authorship. Hearing him speak at the festival’s Opening was one of those rare moments that lingers long after the event has ended. Sir McCullin spoke with remarkable candour about the photographs on display, revisiting the circumstances in which they were made and the difficult decisions that shaped them. He reflected on the lengths he went to in order to bear witness, placing himself amid war, famine and unimaginable suffering and questioned whether those choices had always been right.

Was it right to photograph people at the very limits of human suffering? Was it ethical to go as far as he did in pursuit of an image? Did the act of witnessing justify the personal and moral cost?
These are not questions Sir McCullin has answered and left behind. They remain unresolved, continuing to accompany him decades after the photographs were made. That ethical restlessness, the willingness to question his own actions rather than defend them, is what distinguishes him not only as one of the world’s greatest photojournalists, but as one of its deepest moral voices. Standing before those photographs while listening to the man who made them was a powerful reminder of what photography, at its most committed, can carry. Each image is more than a document of history. It is also a record of the choices, risks and responsibilities behind its making. Sir McCullin’s reflections revealed that the greatest burden is not simply witnessing suffering, but living with the knowledge of what it took to bear witness.

Lammerhuber sees no contradiction in presenting McCullin’s moral questioning alongside contemporary photographers confronting climate change, migration and environmental collapse. For him, the festival is not organised around aesthetics alone, but around photography’s capacity to deepen public understanding of the human condition. The conversations that begin in front of a photograph continue long after visitors have walked away. In an age saturated with images, that ability to make us stop, look and think may be photography’s greatest achievement.

La Gacilly-Baden Photo is Europe’s largest open-air photography festival, extending across 7km of the city. © Cinzia D’Ambrosi

That may ultimately be what Festival La Gacilly Baden Photo does so well. It does not ask us simply to admire photographs. It asks us to live with them, to carry them beyond the exhibition walls and into our own lives. By placing photography in public space, the festival dissolves the boundaries between art and everyday experience, between observer and participant. Images of war, climate change, migration and human resilience are encountered not in isolation, but as part of the ordinary rhythm of the city, inviting everyone into the conversation.

As I left Baden, I realised I was carrying more than memories of remarkable exhibitions. I was carrying the questions they had left behind. Questions about who tells stories and who has the right to tell them. About what it means to bear witness. About our responsibility, not only as photographers but also as viewers.

Lois Lammerhuber photographed by Cinzia D’Ambrosi in front of one of his photographs at the festival. © Cinzia D’Ambrosi

When I asked Lois Lammerhuber what success looks like for the festival, his answer felt inevitable. He was not interested in visitors leaving with certainty. What mattered, he said, was that they left carrying a question, something unresolved that would continue to accompany them long after they had gone home.

Not conclusions. Thought.


Words by Cinzia D’Ambrosi
Photographs © Cinzia D’Ambrosi

cinziadambrosi.com
@cinziadambrosi

This article was first published in What the Records Show, Cinzia D’Ambrosi’s independent publication on investigative reporting and documentary photography.

Interview with Clare Thomas, Photojournalism Nights guest speaker

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is CT_Iraq_04JULY17_8108-1024x684.jpg
©Claire Thomas – Injured and sick civilians are treated at a makeshift field clinic set up inside an abandoned store on the edge of Mosul’s Old City as the fighting continues to liberate the remaining ISIS-held territory, on July 4, 2017.

Claire Thomas is a photographer and photojournalist from Wales, UK, currently based between London and New York. Her photojournalism work focuses on issues relating to global political and military conflicts, human rights, and humanitarian and environmental crises. During her extraordinary career, Claire has produced compelling and timely images and has been extensively covering frontlines battles in ISIS in Iraq.

Q. How did you end up going to Iraq?

In December 2016, I decided to travel to Iraq independently with the goal of focusing on stories related to the military offensive to liberate the city of Mosul and the humanitarian crisis of people displaced by ISIS. Before that, I was based in Greece covering the refugee crisis where I met Kurdish and Iraqi families who had been displaced by ISIS. Hearing their stories, I wanted to better understand the horror that was driving people to flee their homes and risk their lives trying to reach the safety of European shores. As there was a lot of media attention on the war against ISIS in Mosul at the time, I decided to head to Erbil, the capital of the Kurdistan region of Iraq, and an entry point to Mosul.

Q. How long were you there for in total? Will you go back? 

My first visit to Iraq was for just 2 weeks, but I returned a few weeks later and ended up living in northern Iraq for two and a half years. I’ve been back for a few short trips since I left in June last year, and I hope to return later this year or next year. Erbil was my home for a long time, and I became very fond of the place and the people, so I think I’ll always go back whenever the opportunity arises. There’s certainly no shortage of stories to cover in the country, and I’m particularly interested to follow the progress of rebuilding the city of Mosul, which was heavily bombed during the battle against ISIS.

Q. This is very traumatic work, what do you do to decompress after a trip like this? How do you look after your mental health while working? 

I was lucky to have a great support network in Iraq, among other photographers and journalists, the medics I embedded with in Mosul, and also local friends and fixers. My way of decompressing is simply to talk about the situation, which helps me process my own thoughts and feelings, and I was glad that I had a lot of people I could talk to in Iraq.

I think it’s important to be aware of the emotional impact of doing this kind of work, and also to keep in mind that, as outsiders, it’s our choice to be there and we’re extremely lucky to be able to leave the war zone and go back to the safety of our homes at any time.

Of course, being confronted by violence and death is challenging and disturbing, and even more so is seeing people suffering the terror, pain and loss of war. The images that stick in my mind are of mothers crying over the bodies of their children, of soldiers wailing uncontrollably over a fallen comrade, of proud fathers broken by the loss of their loved ones, and the tearless look of shock on the faces of traumatised children. However, I try to focus my thoughts and energy on the incredible strength and resilience of the survivors and the people who helped them survive.

Q. I’m new to photojournalism – self teaching at the moment. How did you get started and did you go through formal means? And how did you get to work in Iraq? Did you pitch to someone as an independent? Would be great to know how it all works. 

I’m also self-taught with no formal training in photojournalism. I studied Politics at University, and after I graduated I spent several years travelling and working overseas. During that time, I developed my interest and skills in photography, and eventually started doing some freelance photography work for my local newspaper in Wales. After a few assignments in Wales I travelled to Palestine where I began producing photo essays about life in the occupied West Bank, which I pitched to several mainstream media outlets.

As a freelancer, I really appreciate having the flexibility and freedom to choose which countries I work in and which stories I cover. Of course, that flexibility comes with the necessity for extreme self-motivation, self-discipline and organisation, as well as the financial burden of paying our own expenses in the hope of selling the work afterwards.

My decision to go to Iraq was one I made independently – I wasn’t sent there by any media outlet. Once I arrived in Erbil, I spoke with a lot of other journalists and fixers to better understand the context and get an idea of stories I could cover that weren’t as widely covered as the military operation in Mosul. In the beginning, I captured the content needed for the story I wanted to cover – photos and interviews – and then sent a pitch with a small sample of images to media outlets. Once editors got to know me and my work, I started to get more commissioned assignments, often working alongside a writer.

It took me a long time to understand how the industry works for freelancers. For me, the most difficult part about being a freelance photojournalist is not the photography or journalism work itself but finding ways to get the attention of editors and my work published. I’m still learning myself, and the best advice I can give is to be persistent and determined, and get to know the publications you want to contribute to.

Clare Thomas
www.clairethomasphotography.com
https://www.instagram.com/claire_thomas_photography/


In Conversation with Jillian Edelstein, Roland Ramanan and Valentina Schivardi

The third Photojournalism Nights event guests speakers Jillian Edelstein, Roland RamananValentina Schivardi answer questions posed from the audience on their work and practice. Their answer lead us into their journey of resilience and commitment in voicing stories of prejudice, injustice and poverty.

Roland Ramanan


©Roland Ramanan

From Sabrina Merolla : Well, you say you are not a photojournalist, but you are showing a stunning example of long-form traditional documentary photography. And the method you described, plus the interviews, make me think of serious socio-anthropological research perspectives. Out of curiosity: what do you teach and what kind of formation do you have?
I would certainly say that I am working within the long form documentary tradition with people like Eugene Richards being a big influence. Richards was a social worker and I am a special needs teacher. I started as a primary school teacher and now I work with a local authority advisory service. I think this gives me a certain training to be able to work with people, empathise and present my ideas.

Really powerful stories and you have shown them all as whole human beings without judgement. You obviously gained their trust, how did you establish consent?

I establish consent by showing them honesty and trying to be clear about what I am doing. That was not always easy and I had set backs. A piece about my work in the local newspaper (which I thought was written sensitively) damaged my relationship with some individuals for a long time. I have more or less given up on trying to get formal written consent, I think it establishes more barriers than it removes. I try to show the work as its developing as much as I can practically can. At the start of the project I didn’t really know what my aims were, now I can be much clearer with people what I’m trying to do and that really helps to build trust. That, and just being there; relentlessly!

Roland, how do you feel about the work now and how do you see the work evolving or is it now finished.

Well, its not finished in terms of becoming a book. I have this on good advice from my mentor and others I trust so I need to keep working and thinking about different angles. Sometimes, nothing happens in the work and I get very down and frustrated but it just takes one good picture to lift my spirits. Just being there and hanging out for hours is something I find gets harder but its what I need to do. You need to find new angles to generate different situations. So at the moment , that means going to the foodbank/church and joining there – once it starts up again. That may lead to other things like photographing a baptism which would be amazing – tantalisingly now just out of reach. But I’m in no particular hurry.

Very interesting work but there are some ethical issues for me when photographing vulnerable people. Do you make people aware of the fact the photos are being made public? Do you get model release forms from people?

I did worry a lot, previously about model release but I don’t need it for a documentary/art project. It is non-commercial use. In the end, you simply have to demonstrate your own integrity and question your own motives over and over again. No model release is a substitute for that.

Roland Ramanan http://rolandramanan.com/

Roland Ramanan’s compelling image of Nina from his powerful ‘Gillett Square’ series is featured among other great photographers in Paul Sng’s This Separated Isle photobook, which is currently being crowdfunded on- https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/invisiblebritain/this-separated-isle If you can, please support this photobook of stories and portraits exploring concepts of identity in modern Britain.


JILLIAN EDELSTEIN

©Jillian Edelstein

How did you protect yourself from the trauma of these stories?

I think it was hard for people to see people (mainly men) who had performed unspeakable acts and atrocities, walk free …but the concept of forgiveness espoused by Tutu, Mandela allowed that to happen. It is to be commended and admired. It was a powerful ‘tool’ to call upon, to draw out, to involve many victims of human rights abuse, torture and conflict. The fact that it happened was remarkable. It helped. It may not have healed but it was powerful in the transition process. I don’t think it ever hoped to turn things around overnight. The compromise is that it is human fragility, survival , emotion at stake ; sadly we don’t seem to learn from history.The after effects of Apartheid and it’s ugly legacy will be felt for decades to come.I was lucky enough to be able to ‘come and go’ as I had my work, my family life in the UK, so being able to leave it, feel a certain distance from it and then later revisit the horror of it intermittently was an enormous saving attribute. 


VALENTINA SCHIVARDI

©Valentina Schivardi

Excellent thanks! How long did you document their ceremonies and are you still in touch with the community?
The first ceremony was back in 2009. Yes, we are still in touch – I’m still working on this project.

Just wondered why the men in this community were not featured so much in the photos?

I guess because women are more photogenic. I’m just kidding. Actually, there were more men than women featured in the editing I showed.

Is the project ongoing? what’s next?

Yes, it’s an ongoing project. I’d love to make a book next.

When you were working on the project were you thinking about making photographs for them at the same time as making pictures for yourself? Did you take different approach for these?

This is a very interesting question for me. Yes, when I’m working on this project I think about both taking pictures for them as well as for myself, which can be tricky. Luckily, it’s been clear in my head since the beginning: I was able to start this project because I was hired to take photos for them. This allowed me to find a point of entry to their community. When possible, I work with an assistant, to make sure that he/she can cover the event for them, so that I can focus on my own project.

Given that the subjects seemed very keen to pose, did you capture moments where subjects had their guards down?

Oh yes. This is a question I had in my head since the beginning. What makes a photograph a more authentic and honest representation of someone? On one hand, it’s fascinating to see how my subject is very conscious of the camera. There’s something very strong about the way they always seem to know exactly how to pose. On the other hand, I’m also interested in showing how contradictory and much more complex we can be, by trying to capture my subjects off guard.

Oh yes. This is a question I had in my head since the beginning. What makes a photograph a more authentic and honest representation of someone? On one hand, it’s fascinating to see how my subject is very conscious of the camera. There’s something very strong about the way they always seem to know exactly how to pose. On the other hand, I’m also interested in showing how contradictory and much more complex we can be, by trying to capture my subjects off guard.

Valentina Schivardi
http://valentinaschivardi.com/